![]() ![]() The ALTERNATIVE (which is what you already said NO TO) as setting up Servers, Firewall rules, etc. That is why they have SERVERS, dedicated to performing (serving) a specific function, in this case file sharing and synchronization between two physically separate locations, so as not to 'hog' your computer doing all this work. Malicious users can also use prompt-engineering tricks to get around these built-in safeguards when using popular text-based image-generation models.OP: NO there is no 'consumer' model as your speaking of, as the consumer PC would be 'at risk' to be sharing it self TOTALLY OPEN on the Internet between two points (hacked, used by child porn / torrent point, etc.) and most of all WOULD BE TOO BUSY SYNCHING ALL THE TIME THE FILES that the 'computer' wouldn't be able to be used by you. While models like Stable Diffusion and DALL-E have filters in place to prevent the generation of sexual or violent images, researchers have found that those models still responded to problematic prompts by generating images that were judged as "unsafe" by an image classifier a significant minority of the time. ![]() "In my head I was thinking, well, presumably once they heard about this they went back to the backend guidelines and just made sure it said, 'Hey, no breasts, no full-frontal nudity,' those kinds of things, and then they fixed it, and then they went on with their day," Rantz said.īut it might not be that simple to effectively rein in the endless variety of visual output an AI model can generate. On his radio show, Rantz expressed surprise that the lottery couldn't keep the site operational after rejiggering the AI's safety settings. Speaking to Rantz, a lottery spokesperson said the organization had "agreed to a comprehensive set of rules" for the site's AI images, "including that people in images be fully clothed." Following the report of the topless image, the spokesperson said they "had the developers check all the parameters for the platform." And while they were "comfortable with the settings," the spokesperson told Rantz they "chose to take down the site out of an abundance of caution, as we don’t want something like this purported event to happen again." Not a quick fix? The spokesperson did not respond to specific questions about which AI models or third-party vendors may have been used to create the site or on the specific safeguards that were crafted in an attempt to prevent results like the one reported by Megan. "I also think whoever was responsible for it should be fired." “We don’t want something like this purported event to happen again” It’s disturbing to say the least,” Megan told Rantz. "Our tax dollars are paying for that! I was completely shocked. The corner of the image features the Washington Lottery logo. The background of the AI-generated image seems to show the bed in some sort of aquarium, complete with fish floating through the air and sprawling undersea flora sitting awkwardly behind the pillows. ![]() The site included the ability to upload a headshot that would be integrated into an AI-generated tableau of what you might look like on that vacation.īut Megan (last name not given), a 50-year-old from Olympia suburb Tumwater, told conservative Seattle radio host Jason Rantz that the image of her "swim with the sharks" dream vacation on the website showed her face atop a woman sitting on a bed with her breasts exposed. The lottery's "Test Drive a Win" website was designed to help visitors visualize various dream vacations they could pay for with their theoretical lottery winnings. The Washington State Lottery has taken down a promotional AI-powered web app after a local mother reported that the site generated an image with her face on the body of a topless woman.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |